From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Updegrove

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
126 P. 719 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 2163

Opinion Filed October 15, 1912.

INSURANCE — Action on Premium Notes — Set-off. Syllabus same as in Van Arsdale v. Edwards, 24 Okla. 41, 101 P. 1123.

Error from District Court, Woods County; R. H. Loufbourrow, Judge.

Action by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against defendant in error, defendant below. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed and remanded.

E. L. Foulke, C. A. Matson, and Sandon J. Vigg, for plaintiff in error.

E. W. Snoddy and F. W. Madison, for defendant in error.


This case must be reversed and remanded upon the authority of Van Arsdale, etc., v. Edwards, 24 Okla. 41, 101 P. 1123, in which the facts are substantially the same.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Updegrove

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 15, 1912
126 P. 719 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Updegrove

Case Details

Full title:VAN ARSDALE-OSBORNE BROKERAGE CO. v. UPDEGROVE

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 15, 1912

Citations

126 P. 719 (Okla. 1912)
126 P. 719