From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valle v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1998
247 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 17, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Shortly after midnight on July 5, 1990, the plaintiff climbed through a hole in the fence surrounding the pool at Astoria Park in Queens. At that time, the pool was closed. The plaintiff, who was 16 years old at the time, had never been diving or swimming before, and had never been to the pool at Astoria Park. The plaintiff ran to the edge of the pool and, although it was dark, dove in head first without giving any thought to the depth of the water, which was approximately six inches. The plaintiff sustained multiple spinal injuries, and ultimately commenced this action against the City of New York.

The Supreme Court denied the City's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and we now reverse.

Under the circumstances of this case, the record establishes that the plaintiff's reckless conduct was the sole legal cause of his injuries ( see, Howard v. Poseidon Pools, 72 N.Y.2d 972; Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Valle v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 1998
247 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Valle v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTIAN VALLE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
668 N.Y.S.2d 474

Citing Cases

Mortis v. Dittl

Although earlier that day she had observed two friends near the dock in water below their waists, when she…

Lee v. Nycha

This Court held that the sole proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries was her placing a heavy, unsecured door…