The question here is whether service of citation was proper in the face of a writ of error attack on a default judgment. The plaintiff's original petition alleged that the defendant, Uvalde Country Club, could be served by serving its registered agent, Henry Bunting, Jr., 137 West Nopal Street, in Uvalde, Uvalde County, Texas. The citation was directed to Uvalde Country Club, by serving its registered agent, "Henry Bunting." The sheriff's return on this citation showed delivery to "Henry Bunting." Uvalde Country Club failed to answer, and the trial court rendered a default judgment in favor of Martin Linen Supply Company, Inc. Uvalde Country Club brought writ of error to the court of appeals within six months of the default judgment. In affirming the trial court judgment, the court of appeals held that the lack of "Jr." was immaterial because it did not constitute any part of the name of the registered agent. 685 S.W.2d 375. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the trial court.

The court of appeals holding conflicts with our holdings in Hendon v. Pugh, 46 Tex. 211, 212 (1876) and Faver v. Robinson, 46 Tex. 204 (1876). In Hendon, we remanded a default judgment because the return reflected that it was served on J.N. Hendon, not the named defendant, J.W. Hendon. In Faver, we remanded a default judgment against John R. Faver because the citation was addressed and served on John R. Favers. There are no presumptions in favor of valid issuance, service, and return of citation in the face of a writ of error attack on a default judgment. McKanna v. Edgar, 388 S.W.2d 927, 929 (Tex. 1965). Moreover, failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure renders the attempted service of process invalid and of no effect. McKanna, 388 S.W.2d at 929.

The record does not show that the person served with citation, "Henry Bunting," was authorized to receive service or that he was connected with the appellant. Rather, the petition alleges that the registered agent is "Henry Bunting, Jr." Thus, the record in this case does not reflect strict compliance with the rules of civil procedure relating to the issuance, service, and return of citation. See, e.g., Tex.R.Civ.P. 101, 106, and 107. In view of our holding we need not discuss the other points of error.

Pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 483, without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the trial court.

Summaries of

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Supreme Court of Texas

Jun 26, 1985

690 S.W.2d 884 (Tex. 1985)

holding that service was ineffective when the person served was "Henry Bunting," but the registered agent was "Henry Bunting, Jr."

Summary of this case from Spanton v. Bellah

holding that citation issued to Henry Bunting as defendant’s registered agent was insufficient because the registered agent was actually Henry Bunting, Jr.

Summary of this case from In re T.M.E.

holding that record did not reflect strict compliance with procedural rules relating to issuance, service, and return of citation, where petition alleged that registered agent was "Henry Bunting, Jr." whereas sheriff's return on citation showed delivery to "Henry Bunting"

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Nelson

Summary of this case from Rooftop Grp. USA, Inc. v. Shopper Events LLC

holding that citation was invalid because it named "Henry Bunting," and not Henry Bunting Jr., as defendant

Summary of this case from Patrick O'Connor & Assocs., L.P. v. Hall

holding failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with rules of service renders attempted service of process invalid and of no effect

Summary of this case from Tvmax Holdings, Inc. v. Spring Indep. Sch. Dist.

holding no strict compliance when original petition stated entity could be served by serving its registered agent "Henry Bunting, Jr." and return of service stated that sheriff served "Henry Bunting"

Summary of this case from Landagan v. Fife

holding failure to affirmatively show strict compliance with rules of service renders attempted service of process invalid and of no effect

Summary of this case from Sozanski v. Plesh

holding that record did not show that person named in return of service, Henry Bunting, was authorized to receive service for, or was connected with, defendant named in petition, when registered agent for defendant named inpetition was Henry Bunting, Jr.

Summary of this case from Sembritzky v. Shanks

holding the name of the agent for service of process alleged in plaintiff's petition must match the name of the agent upon who process was served as reflected in the return

Summary of this case from THRIFTY v. WHO'S CALLING

holding that citation to and service on "Henry Bunting," not "Henry Bunting, Jr.," were defective

Summary of this case from Warren v. Zamarron

holding that where return showed Henry Bunting was served and petition alleged Henry Bunting, Jr. was proper registered agent of defendant, record did not show that correct person was served

Summary of this case from Williams v. Williams

holding service on "Henry Bunting" as opposed to "Henry Bunting, Jr." as registered agent to be invalid service

Summary of this case from Duncan v. Crownridge of TX Owners A.

reversing the entry of a default judgment where the "record" did not reflect strict compliance with the rules of civil procedure relating to the issuance, service, and return of citation

Summary of this case from Acadian Props. Austin v. Kjmonte Invs.

In Uvalde, the return showed that citation was possibly served on the wrong person, whereas here there is absolutely no indication that service was not had upon the correct person.

Summary of this case from T.E. Construction Specialties v. Vista Benefits

omitting suffix to agent's name in return of citation is a failure to strictly comply with rules and renders service invalid

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Nelson

In Uvalde, process was found invalid where the registered agent was named "Henry Bunting, Jr.," but service was delivered to "Henry Bunting."

Summary of this case from $9,000.00 U.S. Currency v. State

In Uvalde Country Club, the citation was served on Henry Bunting, but the petition identified " Henry Bunting, Jr." as the registered agent for service of process.

Summary of this case from Sutherland v. Spencer

In Uvalde Country Club, the petition stated that service should be made on Henry Bunting, Jr., but citation was directed to Henry Bunting.

Summary of this case from Warren v. Zamarron

In Uvalde Country Club, the court held delivery of a citation to "Henry Bunting" was not in strict compliance when the petition identified the registered agent of the country club as "Henry Bunting, Jr." 690 S.W.2d at 884.

Summary of this case from Medeles v. Nunez

noting that our opinion conflicted with Faver v. Robinson, 46 Tex. 204

Summary of this case from De La Fuente v. Castillo

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Summary

Opinion

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Summary

Opinion

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations