From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Utley v. MCI, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 7, 2009
320 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-10328.

April 7, 2009.

Hal K. Gillespie, M. Jeanette Fedele, Karla S. Jackson, Gillespie, Rozen, Watsky, Motley Jones, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Jennifer Burr Altabef, Ann Marie Arcadi, Angelina M. Lapenotiere, Marcus D. Brown, Rachel Ratcliff Womack, Carrington, Coleman, Sloman Blumenthal, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 3:05-CV-46.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


The plaintiffs are several of the thousands of employees laid off by MCI, Inc. ("MCI"), from 2001 through 2004 pursuant to reductions in force ("RIF's"). They allege that they were chosen for the RIF's because of their age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 623, and that MCI retaliated by failing to rehire them after they had filed age discrimination claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The district court entered summary judgment for MCI.

The district court carefully explained its ruling in an impressive opinion of more than one hundred pages. The court examined each plaintiffs claim and analyzed why he or she is not entitled to relief. We have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel. The judgment is AFFIRMED, essentially for the reasons given by the district court.


Summaries of

Utley v. MCI, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 7, 2009
320 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Utley v. MCI, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Norman UTLEY; John Alvarez; Larry Boyd; Richard Garcia; Gordon Guerra…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 7, 2009

Citations

320 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Knox v. Fifth Third Bancorp

Knox's opinions, without more, are an insufficient means to overcome summary judgment on this claim. See,…