From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Zuniga-Osegueda

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 28, 2007
249 F. App'x 545 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50171.

Submitted September 24, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed September 28, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, Antoine F. Raphael, Esq., USR — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Riverside, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Sung Bae Park, Esq., Van Nuys, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

David Zuniga-Osegueda, Adelanto, CA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-04-00112-VAP-01.

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

David Zuniga-Osegueda appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Zuniga-Osegueda's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

We have reviewed the brief and motions, and conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction, and dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, grant Appellee's motion to dismiss based on the valid appeal waiver, and deny all other pending motions.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b)(2). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Conviction AFFIRMED; Appeal of sentence DISMISSED; REMANDED with instructions to correct the judgment.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Zuniga-Osegueda

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 28, 2007
249 F. App'x 545 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Zuniga-Osegueda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ZUNIGA-OSEGUEDA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 2007

Citations

249 F. App'x 545 (9th Cir. 2007)