From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 28, 2011
411 F. App'x 947 (8th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-3517.

Submitted: February 14, 2011.

Filed: February 28, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.

Candace L. Taylor, U.S. Attorney's Office, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellee.

Angela Lorene Pitts, Assistant, John B. Schisler, Assistant, Federal Public Defender's Office, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellant.

Bobby Dale Walker, Herlong, CA, pro se.

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and BYE, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Bobby Dale Walker pleaded guilty to violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250 based on his failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 16901- 16991. The district court sentenced him to a term of thirty months of imprisonment. Walker entered a conditional plea which preserved his right to bring this appeal. He argues the criminal statute (§ 2250) and § 113 of the SORNA ( 42 U.S.C. § 16913) violate the commerce clause of the United States Constitution because they have an insufficient nexus to the regulation of interstate commerce.

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Walker's argument (which he acknowledges raising solely for the purpose of preserving the issue for potential further review) is foreclosed in this circuit by United States v. May, 535 F.3d 912, 922 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that § 2250 is an appropriate exercise of Congress's power to regulate the use of the channels of interstate commerce) and United States v. Howell, 552 F.3d 709, 715 (8th Cir. 2009) ("[A]n analysis of § 16913 under the broad authority granted to Congress through both the commerce clause and the enabling necessary and proper clause reveals the statute is constitutionally authorized."). See also United States v. Reynolds, 116 F.3d 328, 329 (8th Cir. 1997) ("One panel may not overrule another.").

We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Walker

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Feb 28, 2011
411 F. App'x 947 (8th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Bobby Dale WALKER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Feb 28, 2011

Citations

411 F. App'x 947 (8th Cir. 2011)