From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Turnquest

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 16, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-737 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-737.

July 16, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, individualized determinations of the appropriate sentencing guideline range as to each Defendant are as follows:

Defendant Williams has an offense level of 40 and criminal history category III, therefore the appropriate sentencing guideline range is 360 months to lifetime imprisonment;

Defendant Alicea has an offense level of 40 and criminal history category I, therefore the appropriate sentencing guideline range is 292-365 months imprisonment;

Defendant Turnquest has an offense level of 43 and criminal history category I, therefore the appropriate sentencing guideline range is lifetime imprisonment; and

Defendant Bland has an offense level of 40 and criminal history category I, therefore the appropriate sentencing guideline range is 292-365 months imprisonment.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Turnquest

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 16, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-737 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Turnquest

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMAL TURNQUEST, MALIK BLAND, ROBERT WILLIAMS…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 16, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-737 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 16, 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Figueroa

"In short, a sentencing court must conduct individualized and searching inquiries into each defendant's…

Alicea v. United States

The conspiracy ended with Smith's arrest in September 2007. As the Court previously found, Petitioner…