From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Tucker

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 13, 1993
991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993)

Summary

reasoning that the length of the delay was longer than in Antoine, a dilatory court reporter caused almost all of the delay, and Tucker diligently pursued his appeal

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tucker

Opinion

No. 87-5090.

May 13, 1993.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Tucker

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 13, 1993
991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993)

reasoning that the length of the delay was longer than in Antoine, a dilatory court reporter caused almost all of the delay, and Tucker diligently pursued his appeal

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tucker
Case details for

U.S. v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. HOMER LEE TUCKER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 13, 1993

Citations

991 F.2d 1518 (9th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tucker

Tucker filed a notice of appeal on the same day. Due to the repeated failures of the court reporter to meet…