From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Thomis

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jul 20, 2006
2:05-CR-0175-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2006)

Opinion

2:05-CR-0175-PMP-GWF.

July 20, 2006


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration are the Findings and Recommendations (#29) of Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr., regarding Defendant's Motion to Suppress (#15). Defendant Thomis filed Objections (#31) on July 14, 2006, to which the Government Responded (#32) on July 19, 2006.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge should be affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Foley's Findings and Recommendations (#29) of June 29, 2006, are affirmed, Defendant's Objections (#31) are overruled, and Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence for Fourth Amendment Violation (#15), as supplemented (#27 and #28), is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Thomis

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Jul 20, 2006
2:05-CR-0175-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Thomis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL THOMIS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jul 20, 2006

Citations

2:05-CR-0175-PMP-GWF (D. Nev. Jul. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Vezina

(“Because the police reasonably suspected Maggio of dealing in narcotics, it was not unreasonable to believe…

United States v. Notyce

The Ninth Circuit has held that mere suspicion that someone has committed a narcotics trafficking crime…