From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sattar

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2006
02-cr-00395 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2006)

Opinion

02-cr-00395 (JGK).

December 6, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


The Court has received the attached letter from counsel for defendant Lynne Stewart. The letter requests the Court to inquire of one juror, based on a newspaper article, what specific evidence the juror was allegedly referring to in speaking with the reporter. The application is plainly without merit. The request is an impermissible effort to inquire into the jury's deliberations. See Fed.R. Ev. 606(b); United States v. Sattar, 395 F. Supp. 2d 66, 74-75 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). There is no suggestion in the submission of any extraneous information that was improperly brought to the jury's attention. Indeed, the submission indicates that the jury carefully and conscientiously considered the evidence and followed the Court's instructions.

The application is denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sattar

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 6, 2006
02-cr-00395 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sattar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AHMED ABDEL SATTAR, a/k/a "Abu Omar," a/k/a…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 6, 2006

Citations

02-cr-00395 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Mubayyid

The government's FISA applications, the affidavits related to those applications, the FISC orders, and the…

U.S. v. AREF

In Ms. Stewart's case, the district court found that a substantial downward variance was warranted based on…