From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Roe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 15, 2009
322 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-6475.

Submitted: March 30, 2009.

Decided: April 15, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:06-cr-00356-RLW).

Horace F. Hunter, Hunter Lipton, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Jonathan H. Hambrick, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Preston Darnell Roe appeals the district court's order denying his motion to unseal the presentence report of another defendant in a closed criminal case. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties' briefs, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States Dep't of Justice v. Julian, 486 U.S. 1, 12, 108 S.Ct. 1606, 100 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988) (holding that a third party must make a showing of a "special need" in order to gain access to another individual's presentence report). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Roe

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 15, 2009
322 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

United States v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, Antoine M. Wooten…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 15, 2009

Citations

322 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2009)