From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Robinson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 8, 2009
355 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-5106.

Submitted: August 27, 2009.

Decided: December 8, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cr-00076-CMH-1).

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Whitney E.C. Minter, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, Acting United States Attorney, Andrew McCormack, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Richard Henry Robinson appeals the district court's judgment entered pursuant to his guilty plea to failure to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (2006). Robinson reserved, in his plea agreement, the right to challenge on appeal the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in light of this court's recent authoritative decision in United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in Gould. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Robinson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 8, 2009
355 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATE of America. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Henry ROBINSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2009

Citations

355 F. App'x 713 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Harding

" Zuniga, 2008 WL 2184118, at *19; see, e.g., United States v. Rogers, No. 4:09-227, 2010 WL 1664629, at *6…