From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rios-Nolasco

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 11, 2011
421 F. App'x 463 (5th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-10735 Summary Calendar.

April 11, 2011.

Nancy E. Larson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ronald T. Spriggs, Sr., Esq., Spriggs Law Office, Amarillo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 2:10-CR-15-1.

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


Santos Rios-Nolasco appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He argues that his sentence violates the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment because it was disproportional as to his conduct underlying the offense of conviction. A 57-month sentence for a first illegal reentry offense by a defendant with a prior felony conviction for transportation of illegal aliens is not grossly disproportionate to the crime. See Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263, 284-85, 100 S.Ct. 1133, 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980); United States v. Cardenas-Alvarez, 987 F.2d 1129, 1134 (5th Cir. 1993).

The district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rios-Nolasco

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 11, 2011
421 F. App'x 463 (5th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rios-Nolasco

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Santos RIOS-NOLASCO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 11, 2011

Citations

421 F. App'x 463 (5th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Resendez-Gonzalez v. United States

As a result of that deference to legislatures, far more draconian sentences than Resendez's have been upheld…