From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rice

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
Feb 7, 2007
CA No. 6:03-2501-HMH (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2007)

Opinion

CA No. 6:03-2501-HMH.

February 7, 2007


OPINION ORDER


This matter is before the court on the Government's motion to withdraw its motion to reopen the case.

On July 30, 2003, the Government filed a complaint in the instant action against Dennis Rice ("Rice") requesting the foreclosure of certain real property located at 101 Parkston Avenue, Greenville, South Carolina, based upon Rice's alleged default on a mortgage held by the United States Department of Agriculture. (Compl. ¶ 4, 9.) The court stayed the proceedings in the instant case on August 24, 2005, pending the conclusion of Rice's bankruptcy proceedings in the United States Bankruptcy Court. On January 12, 2007, the Government filed a motion to reopen the case. On January 16, 2007, the court granted the Government's motion to reopen the case.

The Government now moves, with the consent of Rice, to withdraw its motion to reopen the case filed on January 12, 2007. Accordingly, the court vacates its January 16, 2007, order granting the Government's motion.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the court's order granting the Government's motion to reopen the case, docket no. 34, is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rice

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
Feb 7, 2007
CA No. 6:03-2501-HMH (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:United States of America Plaintiff, v. Dennis E. Rice, Carolina Capital…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division

Date published: Feb 7, 2007

Citations

CA No. 6:03-2501-HMH (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Williams

Other courts have applied the rule in Shepard andTaylor to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) cases and held that, in…