From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rhoades

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 13, 2005
Case No. 3:05-mj-296 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05-mj-296.

September 13, 2005


DETENTION ORDER


This case came on for hearing at 9:15 A.M. on Monday, September 12, 2005, on Motion of the United States to detain the Defendant without bond.

In requesting detention, the United States relied on the report of the Pretrial Services Officer, the presumption of detainability arising from the nature of the offense and the maximum and minimum sentences, and the probable cause determination. Defendant presented no testimony.

Based upon the evidence presented, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c) will reasonably assure the appearance of the Defendant as required and the safety of the community. Defendant misrepresented her criminal history to the Court at her initial appearance; while the record is not severe, Defendant represented that she had no prior record. Defendant has no stable employment and no stable residence. The Court was advised by her counsel that she would be able to be on electronic monitoring at her mother's residence, but subsequent investigation by Pretrial Services revealed her mother's unwillingness in that regard. The offense alleged is a serious violent felony. Pretrial Services recommends detention.

The term "safety of the community" refers to the community's security from criminal conduct by the Defendant, whether violent or not. United States v. Redd, Case No. CR-3-00-92 (S.D. Ohio January 22, 2001), citing United States v. Ramsey, 110 F. 3d 65, 1997 WL 135443 (6th Cir. March 24, 1997) (unpublished) (when considering the "safety of the community" in the context of pre-trial release, "the courts look to more than whether the defendant has been guilty of physical violence"); United States v. Vance, 851 F. 2d 166, 169 (6th Cir. 1988) (recognizing that community safety concerns focus on not only the safety of particular individuals, but also on the safety of the community as a whole).

The Government's Motion to detain is GRANTED.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) the Defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General of the United States for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

2) the Defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and

3) on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the United States, the person in charge of the facility in which the Defendant is confined deliver the Defendant to a United States Marshal or his deputy for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

Defendants who appeal to a district judge from this Order must, at the same time as filing the appeal, order a transcript of the detention hearing from the court reporter.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rhoades

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Sep 13, 2005
Case No. 3:05-mj-296 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rhoades

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MONICA R. RHOADES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Sep 13, 2005

Citations

Case No. 3:05-mj-296 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2005)