From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Real Property

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 31, 1997
96-3757 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 1997)

Summary

holding that a forfeiture notice sent to prison where the prisoner-owner was incarcerated was constitutionally adequate, regardless of whether the prisoner actually received the notice

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dusenbery

Opinion

96-3757.

October 31, 1997.

Appeal from N.D.Ohio.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Real Property

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 31, 1997
96-3757 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 1997)

holding that a forfeiture notice sent to prison where the prisoner-owner was incarcerated was constitutionally adequate, regardless of whether the prisoner actually received the notice

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Dusenbery
Case details for

U.S. v. Real Property

Case Details

Full title:U.S. v. Real Property

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1997

Citations

96-3757 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 1997)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Dusenbery

United States v. Ray, 114 F.3d 1190, 1997 WL 259361, at *1 (6th Cir. 1997) (quoting Giraldo, 45 F.3d at 511;…

U.S v. Dusenbery

Mullane, 339 U.S. at 314. As the district court correctly stated, citing United States v. Real Property, Tree…