From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Pool

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 2, 2011
646 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-10303.

June 2, 2011.

Robert A. Parker, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Phillip A. Talbert, Assistant U.S., USSAC-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rachelle Barbour, Esquire, FPDCA — Federal Public Defender's Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00015-EJG-1.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Pool

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 2, 2011
646 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Pool

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerry Arbert POOL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 2, 2011

Citations

646 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Mitchell

The three-judge opinion may no longer "be cited as binding precedent by or to any court of the Ninth…

United States v. Fricosu

A panel of the Ninth Circuit was the first to consider the issue in United States v. Pool, 621 F.3d 1213 (9th…