Opinion
File No. 1:05-CR-12-01.
June 1, 2007
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed April 2, 2007 (Paper 100). After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Construing defendant's filing (Paper 99) as a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the motion is DENIED as premature.
Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 22(b), the Court DENIES petitioner a certificate of appealability ("COA") because the petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition, because the petition has been dismissed on procedural grounds, the petitioner cannot be issued a COA due to his failure to demonstrate that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 1604, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).
It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
SO ORDERED.