From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 6, 1999
179 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-6910.

DECIDED July 6, 1999.

G. Douglas Jones, U.S. Atty., James G. Gann, III, Shirley I. McCarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Birmingham, AL, Irene M. Solet, Douglas N. Letter, App. Staff, Civil Div., Dept.,, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

William F. Pendergast, G. Matthew Koehl, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather Geraldson, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, (No. 97-P-1300-S); Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Judge.

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 6, 1999
179 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 1999)
Case details for

U.S. v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 6, 1999

Citations

179 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 1999)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Pemco Aeroplex Inc.

However, we vacated the panel opinion in order to hear the case en banc. United States v. Pemco Aeroplex,…