From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Patrick

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jun 23, 2009
No. 1:08-CR-130 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. 1:08-CR-130.

June 23, 2009


ORDER


On June 3, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Susan K. Lee filed a Report and Recommendation ("R R") (Court File No. 50) recommending the Court deny Defendant Phillip L. Patrick's motion to suppress. Neither party filed an objection.

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Therefore, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the R R (Court File No. 50) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and ORDERS as follows:

Defendant's motion to suppress is DENIED (Court File No. 46).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Patrick

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Jun 23, 2009
No. 1:08-CR-130 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 23, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILLIP L. PATRICK

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

No. 1:08-CR-130 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gentry

Where, as here, a warrant affidavit provides no indicia of an informant's previous reliability, the affidavit…

United States v. Bussell

Also, when relying on his own training and experience, Agent Poston took care to relate his experience to the…