From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Pack

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division
Aug 28, 2007
3:06-CR-144 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

Summary

stating that "overruling by implication is disfavored"

Summary of this case from State v. Hudson

Opinion

3:06-CR-144.

August 28, 2007


ORDER


On the petition of the United States of America by James R. Dedrick, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee,

It is ordered that the Clerk of this Court be and hereby is instructed to issue a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum to the Warden, Arrendale State Prison, Alto, Georgia, to bring Samantha Marlene Pack before this Court at Knoxville, Tennessee, on September 13, 2007, at 1:30 p.m., for an initial appearance, or for her case to be otherwise disposed of upon said indictment heretofore returned against her, and each day thereafter until said case is disposed of, and immediately thereafter be returned to said Arrendale State Prison, Alto, Georgia.

And it is further ordered that in the event the Warden of said Arrendale State Prison, Alto, Georgia, so elects, the United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Tennessee, or any other duly authorized United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, or any duly authorized Special Agent of the National Park Service, is directed to receive said Samantha Marlene Pack into his custody and transport her to and from said Arrendale State Prison, Alto, Georgia, and this Court for the aforesaid purpose.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Pack

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division
Aug 28, 2007
3:06-CR-144 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

stating that "overruling by implication is disfavored"

Summary of this case from State v. Hudson
Case details for

U.S. v. Pack

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMANTHA MARLENE PACK

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Knoxville Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

3:06-CR-144 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 28, 2007)

Citing Cases

United States v. Cox

I am not the first person to acknowledge that the two decisions face in different directions. See, e.g. ,…

State v. Hudson

See id. at 63-64, 124 S. Ct. at 1371 (majority opinion). When the Supreme Court expressly overrules one case…