From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. One 1968 Harvester Farmall-Tractor

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 1971
452 F.2d 110 (4th Cir. 1971)

Opinion

No. 71-1485.

Argued November 5, 1971.

Decided December 14, 1971.

John H. Vernon, III, Burlington, N.C. (Vernon Vernon, Burlington, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

William L. Osteen, U.S. Atty., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and FIELD, Circuit Judges.


In a proceeding to forfeit an International Harvester Farmall-Tractor because of its use in violation of the alcoholic beverage tax laws, Graham Production Credit Association (Graham) claimed the vehicle, alleging that it was the holder of a chattel mortgage on the vehicle. It was stipulated that the mortgagor had a reputation of at least five years' duration for dealing in nontaxpaid liquor, that this reputation was known to the A.B.C. Law Enforcement Office for the county of mortgagor's residence, that the reputation was not known to Treasury agents having jurisdiction, and that the reputation was not known to the County Sheriff's office but an inquiry to it would have been referred to the A.B.C. Law Enforcement Office. It was further stipulated that Graham, before becoming mortgagee, made no inquiries of any law enforcement office with respect to the record or reputation of the mortgagor, in compliance with 18 U.S.C.A. § 3617(b).

In pertinent part, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3617(b) permits remission of a forfeiture only upon a showing that:

[B]efore such claimant acquired his interest . . . the claimant, his officer or agent, was informed in answer to his inquiry, at the headquarters of the sheriff, chief of police, principal Federal internal-revenue officer engaged in the enforcement of the liquor laws, or other principal local or Federal law-enforcement officer of the locality in which such other person acquired his right under such contract or agreement, of the locality in which such other person then resided, and of each locality in which the claimant has made any other inquiry as to the character or financial standing of such other person, that such other person had no such record or reputation [for violating laws of the United States or of any state relating to liquor].

For noncompliance with 18 U.S.C.A. § 3617(b), the district court denied Graham's claim, and ordered forfeiture of the vehicle. We agree.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

U.S. v. One 1968 Harvester Farmall-Tractor

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 14, 1971
452 F.2d 110 (4th Cir. 1971)
Case details for

U.S. v. One 1968 Harvester Farmall-Tractor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. ONE 1968 INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 14, 1971

Citations

452 F.2d 110 (4th Cir. 1971)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Clarke

It is the policy of the Department of Justice not to bring suit or to continue a pending suit for the purpose…

United States v. One 1973 Dodge Maxivan Truck, Etc.

However, remission will be denied to a claimant who has made no inquiry pursuant to the statute. United…