From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ocana

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Nov 9, 2010
Case No. 10-CR-127 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 10-CR-127.

November 9, 2010


ORDER


On October 19, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein issued a recommendation that this court deny defendant Daniel Ocana's motion to suppress evidence recovered during the search of the defendant's house. Neither party has filed a timely objection to the recommendation as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Crim.P. 59(b)(2). After reviewing the recommendation, the court adopts it in its entirety and denies Ocana's motion to suppress. See United States v. Edwards, 894 F.Supp. 340, 341 (E.D.Wis. 1995) (holding de novo review only required for portions of magistrate's recommendation to which timely object is made).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the October 19, 2010 recommendation of Magistrate Goodstein that defendant's motion to suppress evidence be denied (Docket #40) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Daniel Ocana's motion to suppress evidence (Docket #38) be and the same is hereby DENIED.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 9th day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ocana

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Nov 9, 2010
Case No. 10-CR-127 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 9, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ocana

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL OCANA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Nov 9, 2010

Citations

Case No. 10-CR-127 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 9, 2010)