From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. MUA

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 3, 1996
87 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 1996)

Summary

concluding that handgun in open duffel bag on floor on passenger side of car was immediately available to driver, observing that weapon was indisputably within reach because defendant actually reached for it

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Taylor

Opinion

No. 95-30202

Argued and Submitted March 5, 1996 — Seattle, Washington

Filed July 3, 1996



Summaries of

U.S. v. MUA

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 3, 1996
87 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 1996)

concluding that handgun in open duffel bag on floor on passenger side of car was immediately available to driver, observing that weapon was indisputably within reach because defendant actually reached for it

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Taylor

observing that jury had received instructions requiring it to evaluate proximity and availability of weapon

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Taylor
Case details for

U.S. v. MUA

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ZONG BLONG MUA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 3, 1996

Citations

87 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Taylor

See Keys, 95 F.3d at 881 (erroneous instruction not harmless where there existed no jury findings from which…