From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mosley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 636
Jun 11, 2010
383 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-30078.

Submitted May 25, 2010.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed June 11, 2010.

Jeffrey Backhus, Esquire, Helen J. Brunner, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kyana Stephens, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Western District of Washington, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:98-cr-00083-JCC.

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Anthony Mosley appeals from the district court's order modifying the conditions of his supervised release.

Mosley is no longer subject to the supervised release condition that is the subject of this appeal. Accordingly, Mosley's appeal from the district court's order must be dismissed as moot. See United States v. Strong, 489 F.3d 1055, 1059 (9th Cir. 2007) ("An appeal is moot when, by virtue of an intervening event, a court of appeals cannot grant any effectual relief whatever in favor of the appellant") (internal quotation marks omitted).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mosley

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 636
Jun 11, 2010
383 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mosley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MOSLEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 636

Date published: Jun 11, 2010

Citations

383 F. App'x 635 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. D.M.

There is no indication that either case concerned a term of supervised release. By contrast, in United States…

Rogers v. Bon Appetit Mgmt.

Thomas v. Pentagon Fed. Credit Union, 383 Fed.Appx. 635, 637 (11th Cir. 2010). Importantly, pro se litigants…