From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. McCollum

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Sep 29, 2005
Case No. 5:01cr16-RH/WCS, 5:04cv62-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Sep. 29, 2005)

Summary

finding that, even if firing pin had been removed from gun, it was still a firearm under § 921

Summary of this case from Reddick v. United States

Opinion

Case No. 5:01cr16-RH/WCS, 5:04cv62-RH/WCS.

September 29, 2005


ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION


This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (document 101) and the objections thereto (document 103). I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion of the court. Defendant's motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (document 88) is DENIED without prejudice to the filing of any timely and appropriate motion for relief in the event a state court vacates a conviction used to enhance the sentence in this case and with prejudice in all other respects. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. McCollum

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Sep 29, 2005
Case No. 5:01cr16-RH/WCS, 5:04cv62-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Sep. 29, 2005)

finding that, even if firing pin had been removed from gun, it was still a firearm under § 921

Summary of this case from Reddick v. United States

finding that the petitioner procedurally defaulted Gideon challenge to prior state conviction and holding that the actions of counsel did not excuse that default

Summary of this case from Housing v. United States
Case details for

U.S. v. McCollum

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WILLIAM DEAN McCOLLUM, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2005

Citations

Case No. 5:01cr16-RH/WCS, 5:04cv62-RH/WCS (N.D. Fla. Sep. 29, 2005)

Citing Cases

Reddick v. United States

"); United States v. McSwain, 207 F. App'x 355, 356 (4th Cir. 2006) (same); United States v. Cater, No.…

Housing v. United States

He blames trial and appellate counsel for not raising the challenge at sentencing or on direct appeal, but…