From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Maxxam Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Mar 31, 2009
Case No. C 06-7497 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. C 06-7497 CW.

March 31, 2009

Douglas R. Young (State Bar No. 073248).

C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930).

Scott Andrews (State Bar No. 243690).

Farella Braun Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, Special Appearance as Attorneys for MORRISON FOERSTER LLP, A Miscellaneous Party.


ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION OF SPECIAL COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR MORRISON AND FOERSTER LLP TO WITHDRAW AND TO TERMINATE ECF NOTIFICATIONS; DECLARATION OF DOUGLAS R. YOUNG IN SUPPORT THEREOF (Civ. L. R. Rule 7-11 and Rule 11-5 and General Order 45 Section IV.C.4)


The motion of Douglas R. Young and the law firm of Farella Braun + Martel LLP, special counsel for Morrison and Foerster LLP, for an order permitting counsel to withdraw from their appearance in this action and for an order terminating notifications in this action under the ECF Program pursuant to Section IV.C.4 of General Order 45 (governing notices in ECF cases), came before this Court on an administrative motion pursuant to Rules 7-11 and 11-5 of the Civil Local Rules.

Good cause appearing, the motion is granted. Special counsel for Morrison and Foerster LLP, may withdraw from this action. The Clerk shall terminate ECF notices in this action to Douglas R. Young, C. Brandon Wisoff, Scott Andrews and the law firm of Farella Braun + Martel LLP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Maxxam Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Mar 31, 2009
Case No. C 06-7497 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Maxxam Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. RICHARD WILSON and CHRIS MARANTO…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

Case No. C 06-7497 CW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)

Citing Cases

Posner v. Hillstone Rest. Grp.

A defendant engages in spoliation of evidence if it had “some notice that the documents were potentially…