Summary
finding house arrest with electronic monitoring insufficient to rebut the presumption of dangerousness or possibility of flight
Summary of this case from United States v. PayneOpinion
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 09-155-6.
November 22, 2010
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of November 2010, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Pretrial Release (Doc. No. 144), Defendant's Memorandum of Law In Support of Defendant's Motion For Pretrial Release (Doc. No. 178), the Government's response in opposition (Doc. No. 173), and the arguments and proffered evidence presented at the October 27, 2010 hearing, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED.