Opinion
No. 4:09-CR-107-3H.
August 31, 2011
ORDER
On June 7, 2010, defendant Brian James Lyle pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the sole count with which he was charged. Defendant now moves to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing that he is actually innocent of the offense because none of his prior convictions are for an offense "punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year" under North Carolina law. Specifically, defendant contends that Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 130 S. Ct. 2577 (2010) requires the court to determine the maximum sentence he (as opposed to a hypothetical defendant) could have received in determining whether he has previously been convicted of an offense "punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year."
At the time defendant pled guilty, Fourth Circuit precedent foreclosed this argument. See United States v. Harp, 406 F.3d 242 (2005) (holding that the maximum aggravated sentence that could be imposed upon a defendant with the worst possible criminal history is used to determine whether a conviction is for a crime punishable by a prison term exceeding one year under North Carolina law), overruled by United States v. Simmons, No. 08-4475, slip. op. at 15-17 (4th Cir. Aug. 17, 2011) (en banc). In United States v. Simmons, 635 F.3d 140, 146-47 (2011), vacated reh'g granted, No. 08-4475 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2011), a panel of the Fourth Circuit reaffirmed its decision in Harp, rejecting the argument that Carachuri had overruled Harp.
After defendant entered his guilty plea but before sentencing, the Fourth Circuit vacated the panel decision in Simmons and granted rehearing en banc. Simmons, No. 08-4475 (4th Cir. Mar. 18, 2011). On August 17, 2011, the Fourth Circuit issued an en banc decision overruling Harp. United States v. Simmons, No. 08-4475, slip. op. at 15-17 (4th Cir. Aug. 17, 2011) (en banc).
To assist the court in its decisional process, the court hereby directs the government to inform the court, on or before September 6, 2011, of its position as to the impact on this case of the Fourth Circuit's recent en banc decision in Simmons. Defendant may provide a written response to the government's filing on or before September 13, 2011.