From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lee-El

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Nov 24, 2009
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20140-01-KHV (D. Kan. Nov. 24, 2009)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20140-01-KHV.

November 24, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on defendant's letter (Doc. #33) filed November 16, 2009, which the Court construes as a pro se motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Initially, the Court overrules defendant's pro se motion because he is represented by counsel who did not sign the motion. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 (every pleading, written motion and other paper shall be signed by at least one attorney of record); United States v. Sandoval-DeLao, 283 Fed. Appx. 621, 625 (10th Cir. 2008) (no error in refusal to consider pro se motion when defendant represented by counsel); United States v. Castellon, 218 Fed. Appx. 775, 780 (10th Cir. 2007) (if criminal defendant represented by counsel, court does not accept pro se filings or allegations); United States v. McKinley, 58 F.3d 1475, 1480 (10th Cir. 1995) (no constitutional right to "hybrid form of representation").

Defendant's motion also lacks substantive merit. Defendant apparently alleges that he is not subject to prosecution because he is a sovereign of the Moors Empire. Even if defendant is an alien under United States law, he must obey the laws of the United States. See Carlisle v. United States, 83 U.S. 147, 148 (1872); Leonard v. Eley, 151 F.2d 409, 410 (10th Cir. 1945); see also Kerr v. Hedrick, 89 Fed. Appx. 962, 963-64 (6th Cir. 2004) (rejecting claim that citizen of Moorish Science Temple of America exempt from federal criminal laws); Allah El v. District Attorney for Bronx County, No. 09-cv-8746(GBD), 2009 WL 3756331, at * 1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 4, 2009) (same; Moorish-American national of North American Indigenous and Aboriginal "Moors" of the Ancient Moroccan Empire born in America); United States v. Summers, No. 06-20351, 2007 WL 1192198, at *2 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 19, 2007) (same; indigenous Moor of Creek nation); Osiris v. Brown, No. 05-3300-FLW, 2005 WL 2044904, at *2 (D.N.J. Aug. 24, 2005) (same; Moorish citizen); Khattab El v. United States Justice Dept., No. 86-6863, 1988 WL 5117, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 1988) (same; naturalized Moorish citizen).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's letter (Doc. #33) filed November 16, 2009, which the Court construes as a pro se motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, be and hereby is OVERRULED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lee-El

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Nov 24, 2009
CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20140-01-KHV (D. Kan. Nov. 24, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lee-El

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY L. LEE-EL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Nov 24, 2009

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION No. 08-20140-01-KHV (D. Kan. Nov. 24, 2009)

Citing Cases

State v. Wyley

Therefore the party's purported status as a Moorish-American citizen does not "enable him to violate state…

South Carolina v. Ali

Thus, the defendant's purported ground for removal based on the premise that he should not be prosecuted for…