From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Kruger

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jan 10, 1991
923 F.2d 587 (8th Cir. 1991)

Summary

finding that a district court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain suits brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1345 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402

Summary of this case from United States v. Mooney

Opinion

No. 90-2308NI.

Submitted January 2, 1991.

Decided January 10, 1991.

Wyatt L. Kruger, pro se.

Gary R. Allen, Nancy Morgan, and William S. Estabrook, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.

Before ARNOLD, BOWMAN, and MAGILL, Circuit Judges.


Wyatt L. Kruger appeals from the District Court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in its suit against Wyatt Kruger, Martha Kruger (Wyatt Kruger's mother), Pierce Kruger (Wyatt Kruger's father), and Liberty Baptist Tabernacle. The United States brought this action to reduce to judgment Wyatt Kruger's unpaid federal tax liabilities, to set aside transfers of Wyatt Kruger's property to Martha Kruger and to Liberty Baptist Tabernacle, and to foreclose federal tax liens against the property. We affirm.

The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.

The Krugers' principal argument below and on appeal is that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution unlawfully purported to bestow citizenship upon non-white races and other "artificial statutory persons." This argument is absurd.

The District Court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this action, see 28 U.S.C. § 1340 and 1345, and 26 U.S.C. § 7402(a), and correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the government. The Krugers, who resisted the government's motion for summary judgment on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction and liability, failed to set forth specific facts showing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2511, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). We agree with the District Court that the tax assessments plus interest and penalties were liens on Wyatt Kruger's property, see 26 U.S.C. § 6321 and 6322, and Wyatt Kruger was the equitable owner of the property transferred to Martha Kruger and Liberty Baptist Tabernacle, see Iowa Code Ann. § 639.30 (West 1950); First Nat'l Bank v. Frescoln Farms, Ltd., 430 N.W.2d 432, 435 (Iowa 1988).

Because this appeal is utterly frivolous, the government's motion for sanctions in the amount of $1,500 is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1912; Fed.R.App.P. 38; Denison v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 241, 242-43 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069, 105 S.Ct. 2149, 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Kruger

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jan 10, 1991
923 F.2d 587 (8th Cir. 1991)

finding that a district court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain suits brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1345 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402

Summary of this case from United States v. Mooney

finding that a district court had subject matter jurisdiction to entertain suits brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340, 1345 and 26 U.S.C. § 7402

Summary of this case from United States v. Jones

finding argument that plaintiff was citizen of the State of Minnesota, but not the United States to be "absurd"

Summary of this case from Satterlee v. U.S.

rejecting similar argument as "absurd"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Gerads

rejecting as "absurd" defendants' argument that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution unlawfully bestow citizenship upon "non-white races and other 'artificial statutory person'"

Summary of this case from United States v. Mooney

rejecting as "absurd" defendants' argument that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution unlawfully bestow citizenship upon "non-white races and other 'artificial statutory person'"

Summary of this case from United States v. Mooney

rejecting as "absurd" defendants' argument that the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution unlawfully bestow citizenship upon "non-white races and other 'artificial statutory persons'"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Beale

rejecting similar argument as `absurd'

Summary of this case from Kerns v. Smith

rejecting similar argument as “absurd”

Summary of this case from Bert v. Comptroller Treasury
Case details for

U.S. v. Kruger

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. WYATT L. KRUGER, APPELLANT. MARTHA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 1991

Citations

923 F.2d 587 (8th Cir. 1991)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Gerads

And, finally, we reject appellants' contention that they are not citizens of the United States, but rather…

United States v. Mooney

As already noted, the exact arguments raised by the Mooney Defendants, as well as, numerous variations of…