From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jones

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 26, 1988
844 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 87-5556, 87-5575.

April 26, 1988.

Samuel Rosenthal, Chief, Appellate Section, Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Todd Foster, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for the U.S.

Bernard Campion, Charles Campion, San Antonio, Tex., appellees pro se.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Judge Jones is recused, and therefore did not participate in this decision.


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion February 22, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 837 F.2d 1332)


A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jones

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Apr 26, 1988
844 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1988)
Case details for

U.S. v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. MILTON F. JONES, DEFENDANT. UNITED…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Apr 26, 1988

Citations

844 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1988)

Citing Cases

United States v. Monsanto

We now reverse. See, e.g., United States v. Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (CA7 1988); United States v. Nichols,…

United States v. One Residential Property Located at 501 Rimini Road, Del Mar, Cal.

841 F.2d 1485, 1509 (1988). In addition, United States v. Jones involved the Racketeering Influenced and…