affirming district court's decision to enter an order in limine forbidding the defendant from directly or indirectly referencing a state court conviction which the defendant erroneously claimed implicated his double jeopardy rights
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Rplinger96-3517, 97-3403.
November 5, 1997.
Appeal from N.D.Ohio.
Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.
affirming district court's decision to enter an order in limine forbidding the defendant from directly or indirectly referencing a state court conviction which the defendant erroneously claimed implicated his double jeopardy rights
Summary of this case from U.S. v. RplingerFull title:U.S. v. Hoschchild
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: Nov 5, 1997
Defendant is barred from referring to or presenting evidence of the fact that Defendant was convicted in…