U.S. v. Hinojosa

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jose HINOJOSA, also known…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 2010

384 F. App'x 324 (5th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-41272 Conference Calendar.

June 22, 2010.

Jimmy Anthony Rodriguez, Assistant U.S. Attorney, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Edward Cromwell, Esq, Cromwell Law Firm, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jose Hinojosa, Houston, TX, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 2:09-CR-480-1.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Hinojosa presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Dougherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir. 1999) (same); United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (same). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.