From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Harris

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 8, 2008
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 98-80 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 8, 2008)

Summary

holding that defendant was not entitled to a sentence reduction where court found defendant distributed more than 21 kilograms of cocaine base and offense level of 38 still applied

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Polanco

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 98-80.

April 8, 2008


MEMORANDUM


Before the court is the "emergency motion" of Vincent Eric Harris for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

On August 25, 1998, a jury convicted Harris of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, distribution of cocaine base, and use of a juvenile in a drug trafficking crime. During Harris' sentencing hearing on December 18, 1998, the court found that he had distributed more than 21 kilograms of cocaine base, which resulted in a base offense level of 38 under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(C)(1). Harris also received a 6-level enhancement for his role in the offense, which resulted in a total offense level of 44 and a Guidelines range of life imprisonment. The court granted Harris' motion for a downward departure pursuant to United States v. Sally, 116 F.3d 76 (3d Cir. 1997), on the ground of extraordinary post-offense rehabilitation and imposed a sentence of 180 months imprisonment to be followed by 60 months of supervised release. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence on May 5, 2001. United States v. Harris, 210 F.3d 165 (3d Cir. 2000).

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) permits the reduction of a defendant's sentence when he was "sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission." 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B). Harris relies on the Sentencing Commission's adoption of Amendment 706, which lowers retroactively the Guidelines range for possession and distribution of certain amounts of crack cocaine. Prior to the adoption of Amendment 706, the Sentencing Guidelines assigned offense level 38 to any quantity of cocaine base of 1.5 kilograms or more. The amended guidelines now assign offense level 38 only to a quantity of cocaine base of 4.5 kilograms or more. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1).

Here, the court found that Harris distributed over 21 kilograms of cocaine base. Thus, Harris would have received a base offense level of 38 and a total offense level of 44 even under the amended Guidelines. Because Harris was not "sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission," he is not entitled to a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). See, e.g., U.S. v. Herrera, No. CR-92-209, 2008 WL 410074 (W.D. Okla. Feb. 12, 2008); U.S. v. Cross, No. CR-02-83, 2008 WL 355598 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 6, 2008).

Harris has provided the court with information that he has completed a noteworthy number of rehabilitative and educational programs while in prison. While we commend Harris for having done so, we do not find it cause for reducing his sentence based on the recent retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2008, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the emergency motion of movant Vincent Eric Harris to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Harris

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 8, 2008
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 98-80 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 8, 2008)

holding that defendant was not entitled to a sentence reduction where court found defendant distributed more than 21 kilograms of cocaine base and offense level of 38 still applied

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Polanco
Case details for

U.S. v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. VINCENT ERIC HARRIS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 8, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 98-80 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Wright

Thus, Wright would have received a base offense level of 38 and a total offense level of 41 even under the…

U.S. v. Polanco

Considering a Criminal History Category of I in combination with an adjusted offense level of 37, his…