From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Graham

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 31, 1992
982 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1992)

Summary

holding that "structures used as shelters for weekend fishing retreats" are "dwellings"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ingles

Opinion

No. 92-2703.

Submitted December 15, 1992.

Decided December 31, 1992.

William A. McLean, Little Rock, AR, argued, for appellant.

Patrick Harris, Little Rock, AR, argued (Charles A. Banks and Patrick Harris, on the brief) for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge, WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge, and BATTEY, District Judge.

THE HONORABLE RICHARD H. BATTEY, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.


Jeffery Graham appeals the fifty-seven-month prison sentence imposed on him by the district court following his guilty plea to possessing with intent to distribute ten pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues the district court erred in holding him accountable for 100 pounds (45.36 kilograms) of marijuana, and setting his base offense level at 20 under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(12) (at least 40 but less than 60 kilograms of marijuana). He also argues the district court erred in sentencing him as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because his prior conviction for burglaries of structures used as "weekend fishing retreats" was not a "crime of violence." We affirm.

The Honorable George Howard Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

We may overturn the district court's finding as to the amount of drugs attributable to Graham only if it is clearly erroneous. See United States v. Schwarck, 961 F.2d 121, 123 (8th Cir. 1992). We conclude the district court did not clearly err in attributing 100 pounds of marijuana to Graham. Graham admitted to participating in a marijuana distribution network organized and led by Teddye Carter. Carter testified that between January and August 1991, he personally gave Graham over 100 pounds of marijuana, which Graham sold for him. He further testified that he typically gave Graham ten to twenty pounds at a time and that, on several occasions, Graham owed him more than $30,000 for the marijuana. See United States v. Haren, 952 F.2d 190, 200 (8th Cir. 1991) (district court did not err in attributing two kilograms (4.4 pounds) of amphetamine to defendant where testimony revealed he often dealt in ounce and half-ounce amounts, sometimes received half-pound amounts, and once received two pounds). Although Carter and Graham gave conflicting testimony about the amount of marijuana Graham received, we conclude the district court did not clearly err in crediting Carter's testimony.

We also conclude the district court did not err in sentencing Graham as a career offender. "Burglary of a dwelling" is a crime of violence within the meaning of section 4B1.1. United States v. Brunson, 915 F.2d 392, 393 (8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1011, 112 L.Ed.2d 1093 (1991). A "dwelling" is a "building or portion thereof, a tent, a mobile home, a vehicle or other enclosed space which is used or intended for use as a human habitation, home or residence." Black's Law Dictionary 505 (6th ed. 1990). The structures used as shelters for weekend fishing retreats fall within this definition.

Accordingly, we affirm.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Graham

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 31, 1992
982 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1992)

holding that "structures used as shelters for weekend fishing retreats" are "dwellings"

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Ingles

using definition from Black's

Summary of this case from United States v. Stitt

looking to the definition of “dwelling” in Black's Law Dictionary to define the generic meaning of “burglary of a dwelling” in the § 4B1.1 crime-of-violence enhancement

Summary of this case from United States v. Rodriguez

relying on Black's Law Dictionary's “dwelling” definition

Summary of this case from United States v. Ramirez

In Graham, the Eighth Circuit relied on this definition to conclude that burglaries of "structures used as shelters for weekend fishing retreats" are crimes of violence.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Rivera-Oros
Case details for

U.S. v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. JEFFERY GRAHAM, APPELLANT

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 31, 1992

Citations

982 F.2d 315 (8th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Wenner

It is thus particularly incongruous for the dissent to conclude that Washington residential burglary is…

United States v. Ramirez

While we have not been called upon to define “burglary of a dwelling” in the Guidelines' context, at least…