From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Fox

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Feb 13, 2006
Criminal Action No. 05-00301-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Feb. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 05-00301-01-CR-W-GAF.

February 13, 2006


ORDER


On November 7, 2005, Defendant filed a motion for a judicial determination of mental competency. Defendant was examined by Trent H. Evans, Ph.D., a forensic psychologist. It is the opinion of Dr. Evans that Defendant is competent to stand trial. During a hearing held before United States Magistrate Judge Robert Larsen on February 9, 2006, Defendant and the government stipulated to the report of Dr. Evans. Defendant also waived the ten-day objection period to Judge Larsen's Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, after making an independent review of the record, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's motion for judicial determination of mental competency is granted, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Robert Larsen is adopted in its entirety, and this court finds that Defendant is competent to stand trial. It is further

ORDERED that this case is set for trial on the joint criminal jury trial docket commencing March 20, 2006. It is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A), the time between November 7, 2005, and the date of this order is excluded in computing the time within which the trial of this criminal action must commence.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Fox

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division
Feb 13, 2006
Criminal Action No. 05-00301-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Feb. 13, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY ANN FOX, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division

Date published: Feb 13, 2006

Citations

Criminal Action No. 05-00301-01-CR-W-GAF (W.D. Mo. Feb. 13, 2006)

Citing Cases

Santoro v. Mack

By the great weight of authority the payment of part or all the purchase price under a contract of this…

McMahon v. Plumb

Payment, even of the full consideration, as in this case, does not amount to an act of part performance…