From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Fox

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 2009
583 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-30445.

September 16, 2009.

Stephan Alexander Collins, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Anchorage, AK, Kirby A. Heller, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John Michael Fox, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Mary C. Geddes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Kevin Francis McCoy, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Anchorage, AK, for Defendant-Appellee.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Fox

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 16, 2009
583 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John Michael FOX…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 16, 2009

Citations

583 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Us. v. Fox

On timely appeal, the government argued that Hicks misinterpreted Booker, and moved for initial hearing en…

Dillon v. United States

The Ninth Circuit subsequently agreed to consider en banc Booker 's applicability to § 3582(c)(2)…