Summary
rejecting § 2255 claim that counsel should have moved for downward departure because case was not extraordinary
Summary of this case from Mendoza v. United StatesOpinion
Nos. 3:97-CR-263-R (01), 3:99-CV-838-R.
June 12, 2001.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After making the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.