From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Floyd

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 4, 1992
956 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 89-50295, 89-50305.

Submitted August 14, 1991.

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

Decided February 4, 1992.

Alan T. Launspach, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant/cross-appellee.

Barbara A. Curry, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Robert M. Takasugi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before NORRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and KING, Senior District Judge.

Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.



The Opinion filed on September 25, 1991 inadvertently omitted Case No. 89-50305. 945 F.2d 1096 (9th Cir.).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Floyd

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 4, 1992
956 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

U.S. v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. DION…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 4, 1992

Citations

956 F.2d 203 (9th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Vilchez

In evaluating the district court's decision to depart downward from the Sentencing Guidelines range, we…

U.S. v. Ramirez

The defendant's lack of guidance, in combination with other factors, is a proper basis for a downward…