From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Flores

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Oct 10, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3447 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3447.

October 10, 2007


ORDER


On October 3, 2007, counsel for defendant Terra V. Flores filed a Suggestion of Death, informing this court of the death of Terra V. Flores on September 23, 2007.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) provides:

If a party dies and the claim is not thereby extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper parties. The motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the successors or representatives of the deceased party and, together with the notice of hearing, shall be served on the parties as provided in Rule 5 and upon persons not parties in the manner provided in Rule 4 for the service of a summons, and may be served in any judicial district. Unless the motion for substitution is made not later than 90 days after the death is suggested upon the record by service of a statement of the fact of the death as provided herein for the service of the motion, the action shall be dismissed as to the deceased party.

FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1). It is not clear whether the suggestion of death filed by Terra V. Flores's attorney is adequate to trigger the 90-day deadline for filing a motion for substitution under Rule 25(a)(1). See Rende v. Kay, 415 F.2d 983, 985 (D.C. Cir. 1969) ("Although the attorney for the defendant was retained to `represent' the deceased as his counsel, he is not a person who could be made a party, and is not a `representative of the deceased party' in the sense contemplated by Rule 25(a)(1)."). The Rende court further stated: "In our opinion the Rule [25(a)(1)], as amended, cannot fairly be construed, as the defendant's attorney argues, to make his suggestion of death operative to trigger the 90-day period even though he was neither a successor nor representative of the deceased, and gave no indication of what person was available to be named in substitution as a representative of the deceased." Id. at 985-86; compare Ray v. Koester, 215 F.R.D. 533, 533-34 (W.D. Tex. 2003) (finding that the 90-day period had expired without substitution after the decedent's attorney filed a suggestion of death pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 25(a)(1)), aff'd per curiam, No. 03-50513, 2004 WL 96780 (5th Cir. Jan. 21, 2004) (not designated for publication).

The United States of America is ordered to submit a filing setting forth its position on the procedural effect of the Suggestion of Death filed on October 3, 2007 and proposing a procedure with respect to its claims against Terra V. Flores. This submission is due no later than November 2, 2007.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Flores

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Oct 10, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3447 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ERNEST FRANCIS FLORES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3447 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 10, 2007)