From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Eighty Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-One

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
May 5, 2006
Case No. 05-2106 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-2106.

May 5, 2006


OPINION


On April 18, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (#25) in the above cause. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Motion to Suppress Evidence (#19) filed by Bobbie Honorable be DENIED.

On April 28, 2006, Bobbie Honorable filed her Objection to the Report and Recommendation (#26). This court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's reasoning and Ms. Honorable's Objection. After a thorough and careful de novo review, this court agrees with and accepts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Bobbie Honorable's Motion to Suppress Evidence (#19) is DENIED.
(2) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Eighty Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-One

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division
May 5, 2006
Case No. 05-2106 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Eighty Thousand Nine Hundred Forty-One

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EIGHTY THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division

Date published: May 5, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-2106 (C.D. Ill. May. 5, 2006)

Citing Cases

McFadden v. Pryor

Fourth Amendment rights are not derivative, but may only be asserted by one whose Fourth Amendment rights…