From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. D'Amato

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 2, 2008
07-CR-157A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2008)

Opinion

07-CR-157A.

January 2, 2008


ORDER


This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Defendant filed a pretrial omnibus motion seeking various relief. At oral argument, the defendant abandoned his request for the suppression of evidence. On November 28, 2007, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the motion to suppress be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the record in this case, and the pleadings and materials submitted by the parties. No objections having been timely filed, it is hereby

ORDERED, that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion to suppress is denied. The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge Scott for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. D'Amato

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jan 2, 2008
07-CR-157A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. D'Amato

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PASQUALE ANTHONY D'AMATO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jan 2, 2008

Citations

07-CR-157A (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ventry v. U.S.

ave been frequent appearances of the Eoannou, Lana D'Amico law firm — and, particularly, representation of…