From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Comprehensive

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2008
545 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 05-10067, 05-15006, 05-55354.

Filed September 30, 2008.

Erika R. Frick, USSF-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for. Plaintiff-Appellant.

David P. Bancroft, Jeffrey C. Hallam, Esq., David J. Silbert, Esq., Keker Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Comprehensive

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2008
545 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Comprehensive

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMPREHENSIVE DRUG…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

545 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of the U.S.'s Application for a Search Warrant to Seize and Search Elec. Devices From Edward Cunnius.

The Ninth Circuit's initial panel decision is found at United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, 473 F.3d…