From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bunton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 2007
234 F. App'x 488 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50459.

Submitted June 5, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed June 7, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Scott M. Garringer, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James H. Locklin, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Stephen v. Wilson, District Judge. Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01215-SVW-1.

Before: LEAVY, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Michael Bunton appeals from his conviction and 120-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to distribution of co-caine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(iii).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bunton's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bunton has filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government has filed a motion to dismiss, based on an appeal waiver provision in Bunton's plea agreement. Bunton has filed a response to the government's motion, and the government has filed a reply.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. We grant the government's motion to dismiss the appeal of the sentence in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into knowingly and voluntarily).

We decline to consider Bunton's ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim on direct appeal. See United States v. McKenna, 327 F.3d 830, 845 (9th Cir. 2003).

Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.

The conviction is AFFIRMED; the appeal of the sentence is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bunton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 7, 2007
234 F. App'x 488 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bunton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael BUNTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 2007

Citations

234 F. App'x 488 (9th Cir. 2007)