From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bradney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 13, 2009
Mag. No. 09-0175 KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2009)

Summary

discussing the two-step process

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Basque

Opinion

Mag. No. 09-0175 KJM.

August 13, 2009


ORDER


On May 29, 2009, the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller advised defendant Russell Bradney of the special conditions of release including the requirement of submitting to DNA testing as directed by the United States Attorney's Office. This condition was stayed pending a ruling on the same issue in the case before the undersigned of United States v. Jerry Albert Pool, 09-015 EJG. On May 27, 2009, the undersigned ordered that DNA sampling was appropriate and that the defendant in Pool submit to DNA testing. That order was appealed to the District Court and on July 16, 2009, the Honorable Edward J. Garcia affirmed the undersigned's order. That order is currently pending appeal before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay is lifted and defendant Russell Bradney is ordered to submit to DNA testing as directed by the United States Attorney's Office.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bradney

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 13, 2009
Mag. No. 09-0175 KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2009)

discussing the two-step process

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Basque
Case details for

U.S. v. Bradney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RUSSELL BRADNEY

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 13, 2009

Citations

Mag. No. 09-0175 KJM (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Basque

36 C.F.R. § 228.4(a)(4) (emphasis added). United States v. Russell, 2009 WL 33325, *3 (E.D. Cal. 2009)…