From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Bowens

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 30, 2010
372 F. App'x 416 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7632.

Submitted: March 15, 2010.

Decided: March 30, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00110-REP).

Spencer Bowens, Appellant pro se. David Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Spencer Bowens appeals the district court's order denying his motion to correct a clerical error pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Bowens's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bowen.% No. 3:98-cr-00110-REP (E.D.Va. Aug. 6, 2009); see United States v. Johnson, 571 F.3d 716, 717-18 (7th Cir. 2009) (finding that court did not have authority to correct calculation error in the presentence report pursuant to Rule 36). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Bowens

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 30, 2010
372 F. App'x 416 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Bowens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Spencer BOWENS, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 30, 2010

Citations

372 F. App'x 416 (4th Cir. 2010)