From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Barrera-Omana

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 2, 2009
Crim. No. 09-47 (JMR/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2009)

Summary

recognizing that a woman with short or tied-up hair could have been mistaken for a man

Summary of this case from Powell v. Staycoff

Opinion

Crim. No. 09-47 (JMR/JJK).

September 2, 2009


ORDER


The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated August 14, 2009. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Pretrial Motion for Suppression of Physical Evidence (Doc. No. 25), is DENIED; and

2. Defendant's Pretrial Motion for Suppression of Confessions or Statements in the Nature of Confessions (Doc. No. 26), is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Barrera-Omana

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 2, 2009
Crim. No. 09-47 (JMR/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2009)

recognizing that a woman with short or tied-up hair could have been mistaken for a man

Summary of this case from Powell v. Staycoff
Case details for

U.S. v. Barrera-Omana

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. 1. Daniel Martin Barrera-Omana…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 2, 2009

Citations

Crim. No. 09-47 (JMR/JJK) (D. Minn. Sep. 2, 2009)

Citing Cases

Powell v. Staycoff

"CAD" stands for "computer-aided dispatch." See Wolf Aff. ¶ 6 [ECF No. 60]; United States v. Barrera-Omana,…