Summary
finding defendant competent to stand trial where there was no irrational or erratic conduct that would indicate a current competency deficit, the forensic report concluded that the defendant was competent, and defense counsel stipulated to the admissibility and substance of the report
Summary of this case from United States v. DanielOpinion
CRIMINAL NO. 6:07-58-KKC.
January 11, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [DE #33] regarding the defendant's competency to stand trial. No objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, the Court conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and opinion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [DE #33] is ADOPTED as and for the opinion of the Court.