Summary
In United States v. Anderson, Crim. No. 07-236 (RHK/JJG), 2007 WL 2908172, at *3 (D. Minn. Oct. 2, 2007), a two-year passage of time was found not to undermine probable cause given an agent's averment in his affidavit that the defendant was likely to maintain his collection of pornography.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. LemonOpinion
Criminal No. 07-236 (RHK-JJG).
October 2, 2007
ORDER
This matter is before the undersigned upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Tracy T. Braun, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appeared on behalf of the Government. Andrea K. George, Assistant Federal Defender, appeared on behalf of Mr. Anderson. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based on the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and being duly advised of all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED; and
3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. 16) is WITHDRAWN.